“We’re all for a good peaceful protest…Undoubtedly, one of the greatest rhetorical victories of Wall Street has been to successfully plant in the minds of the public the idea that some financial institutions are simply ‘too big to fail,’ and that the ‘failure’ of ‘systemically important’ institutions will result in global financial meltdown and Depression. The reality is much different. So, with the hope of providing the “Occupy Wall Street” protesters with some talking points, what follows are some perspectives that might be useful in framing the issues that we are facing as an economy.”
The above comes from Dr. John Hussman’s Weekly Market Comment. There, the head of The Hussman Funds wrote an excellent article on several very important economic, social, and political issues facing the United States in light of the Occupy Wall Street movement that has gained considerable steam in recents weeks.
Highlights from the article, which can be viewed in its entirety below, follow:
http://www.hussmanfunds.com/wmc/wmc111010.htm
When Wall Street talks about the “failure” of a bank or other financial institution it means the failure of the company to pay off its own bondholders. It does not mean that depositors, counterparties or other bank customers lose money (See Recession, Recovery, and the Ring-Fence ). A bank is essentially a big portfolio of assets, about 70% which are typically financed by depositors, customers and other liabilities, about 20% by the bank’s own bondholders, and about 10% with the capital of the bank’s stockholders. In a typical bank “failure,” the bank is taken into receivership by regulators, the liabilities to stockholders and bondholders are cut away, the remaining package of assets and liabilities is sold as a single entity to some other firm (or can be reissued to investors as a new company), the old bondholders get the proceeds of that sale, and the stockholders are wiped out. When investors willingly take a risk, and buy the stocks and bonds issued by an institution that goes on to mismanage its business, this is the appropriate outcome. Depositors and customers typically don’t lose a penny.
In 2008, the Federal Reserve created a set of off-balance sheet shell companies called “Maiden Lane” to buy undesirable long-term assets of Bear Stearns and other financial companies, justifying the purchases by appealing to Section 13.3 of the Federal Reserve Act. But if you actually read Section 13, it is clear that under the law, “discounting” means (as it has always meant) providing short-term liquidity by essentially providing a check-cashing service for obligations that are short-dated, well-collateralized, and promptly collectible (See also Outside the Oval / The Case Against the Fed ). The Fed’s creation of the Maiden Lane companies to purchase bad assets was, and remains, illegal under the language and intent of the Federal Reserve Act.
This process takes on a grotesque character when it becomes possible for a company to distribute its impact over a very large number of units, and government policy protects that ability even when the impact of the company reflects not skill but ineptitude. This is essentially what has happened with the “too big to fail” institutions. Despite inflicting massive damage on the economy, they are afforded a protected status that allows them to extract “rents” that don’t reflect the cost they have imposed. From that standpoint, the Occupy Wall Street protests are a welcome reflection of public frustration over Washington’s slavish coddling of reckless financial institutions.
The proper way to address the present economic imbalances is pursue policies that encourage the restructuring of bad debt, the allocation of public funds and private savings to productive investment and new research, the accumulation of education and labor skills (“human capital”) to allow workers to capture a greater share of their own productivity, and the continuation of social safety nets to ease the economic adjustments that are necessary in a deleveraging economy. In my view (which not everyone will like), this requires:
Platinum Group Metals Purchases Canadian Platinum Project
- The mineralization is in a well-recognized deposit model known as a "Komatiite Hosted" setting.
- The discovery, made during exploration for diamonds, is notable as it is a first for this part of the Northwest Territories.
- The platinum group metals grades are at the top end of the global ranges for the copper nickel mineralization style.
- Platinum Group Metals will utilize the winter season to review and model all of the extensive project data and establish supplies at the exploration camp for a drilling campaign in the spring and summer 2012.
